Listing Which GitHub Pull Requests are in a Project (2 mins read).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bbe03/bbe039ef1bb959f2bc6ec147ae85569f1a64c239" alt="Featured image for sharing metadata for article"
How to list the PRs inside a Project on Github, for example, via a Ruby client.
Listing Which GitHub Pull Requests are in a Project (2 mins read).
How to list the PRs inside a Project on Github, for example, via a Ruby client.
GitHub isn't Open Source, and it's acquisition by Microsoft was not proof of their commitment to Open Source as a movement. There are other things that indicate a meaningful change in respect of the movement. ASOP is an "Open Source Project" in name and software license only.Matthew S. Wilson (msw) (@_msw_)Sun, 24 Oct 2021 18:15 +0000
Does this include breaking down unethical uses of software by organisations like ICE?
So with the recent discovery that GitHub Actions create an OIDC identity per run, it's possible to configure Vault to allow auth w/ Actions identities and subsequently use that to get access to... anything. Some cleanup required but this is very promising! (c/o @grantorchard)Mitchell Hashimoto (@mitchellh)Mon, 20 Sep 2021 21:02 +0000
Ok I blogged about it. That's how excited I am. 1. Deploy this CFN template 2. Write this GHA workflow 3. Never worry about IAM users again awsteele.com/blog/2021/09/1…Aidan W Steele (@__steele)Wed, 15 Sep 2021 03:38 +0000
It is... curious to see GitHub listed as a type of #OpenSource software in the State of Open UK Phase 2 report. Yes, git is OSS, but GitHub very much is not.julia ferraioli (@juliaferraioli)Fri, 09 Jul 2021 20:42 +0000
If your AI processes AGPL licensed source code and thereby incorporates it, is your AI code required to be released to the public? Roll 3d6 and hire that many lawyers.Post details
Anybody else wandering how "machine learning" laundering of copywritten works is going to hold up in court? twitter.com/dmofengineerin…'jamin (@acdimalev)Thu, 08 Jul 2021 18:58 +0000
DM of Engineering (@dmofengineering)Thu, 08 Jul 2021 19:19 +0000
Fucking lol 😆😆😆
Patrick Kelly (@pkell7)Fri, 02 Jul 2021 20:24 +0000
In case it's not clear what's happening here: @github's Copilot "autocompletes" the fast inverse square root implementation from Quake III — which is GPL2+ code. It then autocompletes a BSD2 license comment (with the wrong copyright holder). This is fine.Post details
I don't want to say anything but that's not the right license Mr Copilot.
Armin Ronacher (@mitsuhiko)Fri, 02 Jul 2021 09:01 +0000
Stefan Karpinski (@StefanKarpinski)Fri, 02 Jul 2021 14:38 +0000
I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as Copilot, is in fact, GNU/Copilot, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU code trained Copilot. Copilot is not an AI system unto itself, but rather a proprietary component that launders GNU code
Post details
"Once, GitHub Copilot suggested starting an empty file with something it had even seen more than a whopping 700,000 different times during training -- that was the GNU General Public License." docs.github.com/en/github/copi…eevee (@eevee)Wed, 30 Jun 2021 02:49 +0000
Ian Coldwater 📦💥 (@IanColdwater)Thu, 01 Jul 2021 12:25 +0000
Last Copilot hot take. MS/Github have used their dominant market position as the largest source of public code in the world to build a closed proprietary service, without the explicit consent of their customers.
Ant Stanley #BLM (@IamStan)Thu, 01 Jul 2021 08:34 +0000
If Microsoft loves open source, then just make Copilot open source. It would be the bare minimum fair thing to do since without all that open source training data set, they would not be able to build it. But no, they want to monetize it.André Staltz (@andrestaltz)Wed, 30 Jun 2021 16:04 +0000
github copilot has, by their own admission, been trained on mountains of gpl code, so i'm unclear on how it's not a form of laundering open source code into commercial works. the handwave of "it usually doesn't reproduce exact chunks" is not very satisfying
eevee (@eevee)Wed, 30 Jun 2021 00:47 +0000
What's the license of source code generated by GitHub Copilot?
Rich Persaud (@stacktrust)Tue, 29 Jun 2021 15:01 +0000
throwback to that time a Google recruiter reached out to me after seeing my GitHub profile this was several months ago, but it’s only just dawned on me that they must’ve seen my profile full of abandoned projects and thought “yep, that’s Google material right there” 😂Luna 🏳️🌈 (@lunasorcery)Thu, 10 Jun 2021 16:45 +0000
As it doesn't retain the history from the template, it may not be possible to update them easily?
Git != GitHub
Ayushi Rawat (@ayushi7rawat)Sat, 22 May 2021 22:19 +0000
I've used https://github.com/palantir/bulldozer before and that's been good
Is your fork behind? You can now sync from the parent repo with just a single click! 🖱💥
GitHub (@github)Thu, 06 May 2021 19:06 +0000
We've found it to work quite well on my team, as it allows folks to see things they're not necessarily involved in, and actively seeks out their thoughts, as well as not leaving it up to the PR raiser to decide who
(Although we're currently using the "round Robin" approach)
It also doesn't mean others can't review
Hmm I'll have to try it but I thought rebase-merge was the same as a --no-ff
merge
You can also do this with a "rebase merge" on GitHub, and yep would recommend it if you don't want merge commits. I'd generally say keep them, but amend the titles to be ie PR title
I wrote a Chrome extension on Twitch that highlights when you are on a GitHub repository belonging to an RMS open letter of support signator. You can download and install the extension from here: github.com/aaronbassett/r…Aaron Bassett - 🥑🪐 (@aaronbassett)Mon, 29 Mar 2021 18:26 +0000
I'll tell you what is NOT a github action: dropping ICE.
Enrique staying ~ (@chochosmx)Mon, 29 Mar 2021 15:00 +0000
GitHub now automatically creates a table of contents for your README.md files from your headers. 📖 After much consideration, we made this a feature of the viewer, not a concern of the editor: no special markdown to insert. 💡 Let us know what you think!Nat Friedman (@natfriedman)Fri, 26 Mar 2021 12:54 GMT
Open source friends: what are the best pieces of "Git/GitHub etiquette" you've picked up over the years? Things like submitting large changes commit-by-commit to help reviewers out.
Celeste Horgan (@celeste_horgan)Thu, 25 Mar 2021 21:06 GMT
We only have this set up in a few places as it's not possible to do it org-level as you say, or configure it via the API https://github.community/t/support-autolink-reference-configuration-in-the-api/14614/
imagine tweeting this barely over a month after your head of HR quit over a blatantly illegal firing lol
Michael Guerin (@MrSebguer)Sun, 21 Feb 2021 19:50 GMT
I wonder what turn around? Selling to Microsoft? I hear that GitHub still has a pretty toxic culture. I know nothing about Jason but it’s serious red flag of other pathologies to see a exec out on Twitter thirsting for more credit and recognition.
Post details
I hope one day we can tell the GitHub turnaround story. Many great people should be known & stories/lessons told For this tweet, simply this: Betting on myself 19 friends said I shouldn't do it: couldn't be done 1 said I *absolutely* had to: bet on yourselftwitter.com/jmj/status/136…Jason Warner (@jasoncwarner)Sat, 20 Feb 2021 15:47 GMT
kellan (@kellan)Sun, 21 Feb 2021 19:27 GMT
Congrats on moving! I'd also be interested what triggered the move 🙃
GitHub Issue forms are coming! 📣 Thanks @github! for making reporting issues a breeze now! 🚀No more weird Markdown stuff. At @home_assistant we are proud to have the privilege to participate in the limited alpha test of this new feature! 😎Franck Nijhof (@Frenck)Sat, 30 Jan 2021 20:54 GMT
.@GitLab releases many features years before GitHub. Every month on the 22nd, transparent and open. 10 examples in this thread 💡 about.gitlab.com/is-it-any-good…Sid Sijbrandij (@sytses)Thu, 21 Jan 2021 20:30 GMT
Heads of HR don’t operate in a vacuum and they make moves with approvals from their boss in the C-Suite. twitter.com/githubpolicy/s…Post details
We found significant errors of judgment and procedure in a recent employee separation. We have reversed the separation, and our head of HR has taken personal accountability and resigned from GitHub. We apologize sincerely to the employee. github.blog/2021-01-17-upd…GitHub Policy (@GitHubPolicy)Sun, 17 Jan 2021 17:29 GMT
jill wohlner (@JillWohlner)Sun, 17 Jan 2021 20:11 GMT
"we're sorry we got caught this time"
Black lives still matter. 🏳️⚧️ (@war_queer)Sun, 17 Jan 2021 18:07 GMT